L2/01-376
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 N2382 |
DATE: 2001-10-6
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2
Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) - ISO/IEC 10646
Secretariat: ANSI
DOC TYPE: |
National Body Contribution |
TITLE: |
Guideline to correct fatal error on UCS |
SOURCE: |
Japan T. L. Kobayashi |
PROJECT: |
JTC 1.02.18 – ISO/IEC 10646 |
STATUS: |
Input to proposed AMD1 – 10646-1:2000 |
ACTION ID: |
For review by WG2 |
DUE DATE: |
2001-01-31 |
DISTRIBUTION: |
SC2/WG2 members and Liaison organizations |
MEDIUM: |
Electronic |
NO. OF PAGES: |
2 |
This contribution paper proposes some guideline for the correctionprocedure of fatal errors found in ISO/IEC 10646 especially in CJKUnified Ideographs part. And also this contribution paper proposes somerecommendation/request to maintain mapping information between ISO/IEC10646 and several domestic/private coded character sets.
Related documents and action item are as follows.
N2271: Propose to amend two source code changes in BMP CJK Unified Ideographs block (TCA)
N2294: Feedback from Japan on N2271 – Proposal by TCA to amend two source code changes in BMP CJK Unified Ideographs block (Japan)
AI-39-9b: To examine the proposal in document N2271 -- Proposal to amend two source code changes in BMP CJK Unified Ideographs block; TCA; 2000-09-19 – and advise WG2 on a possible corrigendum to 10646-1 for the T-Column entries in the CJK tables.
Principles:
*Code position and printed shape of ISO/IEC 10646 should not be changeddefinitely in principle.
*If there found fatal error, it should be changed as earlier as possibleto minimize confusion and loss.
Consideration of impact on standard itself and implementation:
*Arbitrary and shortsighted change may make some inconsistency instandard itself.
*Arbitrary and shortsighted change may make some confusion and loss foralready implemented systems and products.
*Especially, if correction of error causes some change on mappinginformation between ISO/IEC 10646 and existing domestic/private codedcharacter sets, best effort to avoid change of mapping information shouldbe done.
Guideline for correction of fatal error:
*Change of code position should not be done definitely. If needed, new code position assignment is preferable.
*Change of printed shape of character, which causes mapping information between
ISO/IEC 10646 and existing domestic/private coded character sets, should
be minimized.
*If change of shape of character is inevitable, information of change should
be widely announced as earlier as possible.
*Also history of changes should be kept consistent and widely open.
Note:
*Primarily owners of mapping information between ISO/IEC 10646 and current domestic/privatecoded character sets are developer of each character sets except domestic/private coded character sets are quoted in ISO/IEC 10646 as source information.
Recommendation/request:
*Although mapping information between ISO/IEC 10646 and existingdomestic/private coded character sets is out of SC2/WG2's scope, it iswelcomed that some organization collects mapping information and maintain it consistently as volunteer.
*And it is also welcomed that this information is widely disclosed.