Number of members in good standing as of this meeting: 19, Number of members in regular attendance: 17, Quorum: 9.
PRESENT: Adobe Systems, Inc.; Apple Computer; Basis Technology; Hewlett Packard; IBM Corporation; Justsystem Corp.; Microsoft Corporation; NCR; RLG (by proxy); Sun Microsystems; Sybase, Inc.; Unisys Corporation (by proxy).
NOT PRESENT: Government of India, MIT; Government of Pakistan, NLA; Oracle Corp.; PeopleSoft; Progress Software; Reuters, Ltd.; SAP AG.
NOT IN REGULAR ATTENDANCE: Government of India, MIT; Reuters.
Total members represented: 12, Total not represented: 7
Calendar Review and Update
UTC 93/L2 190 - November 5 - 8, 2002, Nashua, NH, host HP (Annual Members Mtg)CLAUI
UTC 94/L2 191 - March 4 - 7, 2003, Mountain View, host Microsoft
UTC 95/L2 192 - June 3 - 6, 2003, San Jose, host Adobe
UTC 96/L2 193 - August 19 - 22, 2002, Bay Area, host TBDCalendar details posted at www.unicode.org/unicode/timesens/calendar.html
[92-A1] Action Item for Mike Ksar: Send to Unicore the proposal for consensus on CLAUI. [L2/02-248]WG2[92-A2] Action Item for Mike Ksar: Send to Unicore a solicitation for comments on the CSDG report by the first week of September.
[92-A3] Action Item for Peter Edberg: Make sure that Cora begins to check the DPRK compatibility character additions (122 chars) in time for them to be included in the US national ballot comments, by end of September 2002. Make sure there are no further duplicates and that the mappings for each character are correct. See the FPDAM document L2/02-300. [L2/02-291, 292]FBXX Ligatures[92-A4] Action Item for Rick McGowan, Editorial Committee: Post an erratum for two variation sequences (<2278, FE00> and <2279, FE00>), remove from list of variation sequences, and reflect the erratum in Unicode 3.2.1. (see L2/02-291)
[92-C1] Consensus: Add to the issues list the two Khmer characters U+17A3 and U+17D3 as candidates for deprecation, and the four Khmer characters U+17B4, U+17B5, U+17A4, and U+17D8 as discouraged for use. Post a public notice on the "Public Issues" page. [L2/02-291]
[92-A5] Action Item for Rick McGowan, Editorial Committee: Add to the public issues list the U+17A3 and U+17D3 as candidates for deprecation, and U+17B4, U+17B5, U+17A4, and U+17D8 as discouraged for use. Post a public notice. [L2/02-291]
[92-A6] Action Item for Peter Edberg: Ask Cora to verify that the CJK source references are correct in FPDAM document L2/02-300, by the end of October.
[92-A7] Action Item for Peter Edberg, Mark Davis, Cathy Wissink: Check that suggested corrections in Amendment 1 (WG2 N2444, resolution M42.20) don't impact character set mappings. Verify by the end of October.
[92-C2] Consensus: The UTC accepts the consent docket L2/02-292 as modified during the meeting:
[92-A8] Action Item for Lisa Moore: Add consideration of the 122 DPRK CJK compatibility characters until UTC 93. [L2/02-292]
- Name changes to U+0601, U+0614, U+0657, U+0658, aligning U+0658 with Michael Everson's comments.
- Encoding changes for three combining double diacritics, UPA symbols, variation selectors
- Newly added characters for Urdu, Syriac, and DPRK symbols
- Hold action on 122 CJK compatibility characters until UTC 93
- Rescind approval U+17EA, U+17EB, U+2FDF, as needs further investigation
[92-A9] Action Item for Ken Whistler: Update the pipeline according to the approved WG2 consent docket, L2/02-292.
[92-A10] Action Item for Ken Whistler: Verify the name of U+0658 with Michael Everson.
[92-C3] Consensus: The UTC does not intend to encode any more ligatures in the FBxx range. [L2/02-286]Dashes[92-C4] Consensus: The UTC declines to consider a Unicode Object File (".uof") text format, because such work is out of scope for the Consortium. [Document ref: http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2002-m08/0420.html]
[92-A11] Action Item for Eric Muller: Get contrasting examples to show em dashes, 3/4 em dashes and 1/3 em dashes. [L2/02-277]Vertical Line Extension Character[92-A12] Action Item for Mark Davis, Editorial Committee: Post as a Public Issue that the UTC is considering adding language on en dashes and em dashes that they should connect. Comments due by October 31, 2002.
[92-C5] Consensus: The UTC accepts the new character VERTICAL LINE EXTENSION used for arrows, proposed for addition at code point U+23D0 with properties as in document L2/02-278.Unicode 4.0[92-A13] Action Item for Ken Whistler: Update the pipeline for VERTICAL LINE EXTENSION. [L2/02-278]
[92-A14] Action Item for Eric Muller: Prepare the WG2 proposal summary form for submission to WG2.
[92-A15] Action Item for all members: In preparation for approving Unicode 4.0 at the November meeting, review the draft of chapters 1 to 4 of Unicode 4.0 which will be posted a month in advance of the November meeting.
PRESENT: Adobe Systems, Inc.; Apple Computer; Hewlett Packard; IBM Corporation; Justsystem Corp.; Microsoft Corporation; NCR; RLG (by proxy); Sun Microsystems; Sybase, Inc.; Unisys Corporation (by proxy).
NOT PRESENT: Basis Technology; Government of India, MIT; Government of Pakistan, NLA; Oracle Corp.; PeopleSoft; Progress Software; Reuters, Ltd.; SAP AG.
Total members represented: 11, Total not represented: 8
Unicode Technical Reports - Normalization
[92-A16] Action Item for Mark Davis, Editorial Committee: Add a reference to Annex B of Unicode Annex: #15: Unicode Normalization that points to useful, informative material including Unicode Tech Notes and FAQs.UTC 91/L2 188 Minutes[92-C6] Consensus: Add an informative reference in Unicode Annex: #15: Unicode Normalization to UTN #5, in the Unicode Version 4.0 time frame, or when appropriate.
[92-C7] Consensus: Approve the minutes of UTC 91/L2 188 as documented in L2/02-166.Scripts and New Characters - DevanagariMinutes posted publicly at www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/utc-minutes.html
[92-A17] Action Item for Eric Muller: Summarize for the Editorial Committee items from the TDIL January 2002 newsletter that pertain to descriptions in the standard. [L2/02-268]Unicode Technical Reports - Collation[92-A18] Action Item for Mark Davis, Officers: Encourage Om Vikas and the Gov't of India to work within the UTC process when communicating with the committee. [L2/02-268]
[92-A19] Action Item for Michael Chaplain, Cathy Wissink: Write a FAQ entry within Indic FAQ covering the Unicode position with regard to the TDIL Newsletter document, and send to the editorial committee. [L2/02-268]
[92-C8] Consensus: Synchronize the version and repertoire of the Unicode Collation Algorithm (UCA) with versions of the Unicode Standard starting with Version 4.0. [L2/02-280, 308]Scripts and New Characters - Egyptian Hieroglyphics, Gardiner set.
[92-C9] Consensus: The UTC is pleased to see the progress made on Egyptian hieroglyphics and will welcome a proposal on the Gardiner set plus supplements to consider at the next UTC meeting in November, 2002. [L2/02-281, 288, 290, 295]Scripts and New Characters - Kharoshthi[92-A20] Action Item for Rick McGowan: Work with Michael Everson to ensure there is an initial proposal for Egyptian Hieroglyphics ready for the November meeting. It should contain the Gardiner set and all letters of support. [L2/02-281, 288, 290, 295]
[92-A21] Action Item for Stephan Baums, Rick McGowan: Update the Kharoshthi proposal with comments received and produce a modified proposal in time for the upcoming UTC and WG2 meetings. Forward to Mike Ksar for WG2 posting.Scripts and New Characters - Greek Paleographic Additions
[92-C10] Consensus: Accept the GREEK CAPITAL LUNATE SIGMA SYMBOL, at U+03F9. [L2/02-314]Unicode Technical Reports - Collation[92-A22] Action Item for Ken Whistler: Add GREEK CAPITAL LUNATE SIGMA SYMBOL at U+03F9 to the pipeline. [L2/02-314]
[92-A23] Action Item for Maria Pantelia: Provide an amended proposal summary form with the name GREEK CAPITAL LUNATE SIGMA SYMBOL and proposed code point U+03F9, for forwarding to WG2. [L2/02-314]
[92-A24] Action Item Maria Pantelia: Consult with epigraphers regarding whether a case pair for "san" is needed, and produce a revised proposal. [L2/02-313]
[92-A25] Action Item for Maria Pantelia: Produce new proposal for the eleven New Testament sigla in time for the November meeting, taking into account more generic names, properties, etc. Have the Editorial Committee review the names. [L2/02-317]
[92-A26] Action Item for Maria Pantelia: Update the proposals for ancient Greek editorial and punctuation characters, Greek metrical characters, ancient Greek musical characters, and Greek numerical characters. Include WG2 proposal summary forms. [L2/02-312, 315, 316, 318]
[92-C11] Consensus: Synchronize the Unicode 4.0 repertoire and UCA when 4.0 is published.[92-C12] Consensus: Change the UCA in 4.0 so that characters which are not in the repertoire associated with the major/minor version of the UCA are not to be decomposed in Step 1 of the algorithm.
[92-A27] Action Item for Mark Davis, Ken Whistler: Update Unicode Technical Standard #10 Unicode Collation Algorithm. Reflect the consensus items [92-C11] and [92-C12] synchronizing Unicode 4.0 and UCA.
[92-A28] Action Item for Mark Davis, Cathy Wissink, Editorial Committee: Move section 5.17 of the Unicode Standard into Unicode Technical Standard #10 Unicode Collation Algorithm and possibly update with material from Cathy & Michael's tutorial, time permitting.
[92-C13] Consensus: Add language to Unicode Technical Standard #10 Unicode Collation Algorithm that describes the current use of soft hyphen to prevent contraction in collation.
[92-A29] Action Item for Mark Davis, Editorial Committee: Add language to Unicode Technical Standard #10 Unicode Collation Algorithm that describes the current use of soft hyphen to prevent contraction in collation.
[92-C14] Consensus: Add an informative section on stability (issues involved and possible ways to handle) to Unicode Technical Standard #10 Unicode Collation Algorithm.
[92-A30] Action Item for Mark Davis, Editorial Committee: Add an informative section on stability (issues involved and possible ways to handle) to Unicode Technical Standard #10 Unicode Collation Algorithm.
PRESENT: Adobe Systems, Inc.; Apple Computer; Hewlett Packard; IBM Corporation; Justsystem Corp.; Microsoft Corporation; NCR; RLG (by proxy); Sun Microsystems; Sybase, Inc.; Unisys Corporation (by proxy).
NOT PRESENT: Basis Technology; Government of India, MIT; Government of Pakistan, NLA; Oracle Corp.; PeopleSoft; Progress Software; Reuters, Ltd.; SAP AG.
Total members represented: 11, Total not represented: 8
WG2 - FPDAMs of 10646, Part 2, Amd. 1; Part 1, Am. 2
[92-A31] Action Item for Asmus Freytag: Verify that U+2615 HOT BEVERAGE is correct in the Unicode charts.UTC Membership Roll Call Adjustment:[92-A32] Action Item for Peter Edberg: Ask Cora to check KSC 5601 mappings for the CJK compatibility ideographs in the F900 block, by the end of October.
[92-A33] Action Item for Rick McGowan, Debbie Anderson: Check the spelling of the name of U+10092.
[92-A34] Action Item for Eric Muller: Supply Michel Suignard with information on Mongolian hyphens for US comments on the WD 3rd Edition of 10646. [L2/02-282]
[92-A35] Action Item for Peter Edberg: Investigate the 1.1 to 2.0 Hangul mapping inconsistencies and discuss the results with Michel Suignard, to be included in US comments on the WD 3rd Edition of 10646. [L2/02-282]
[92-C15] Consensus: The UTC requests that WG2 ask SC2 to authorize a 3rd edition of 10646 based upon the draft provided by the editor.
Unicode Technical Reports - Collation
[92-C16] Consensus: The UTC would like the default table to handle the trailing weight problem for Korean, and therefore will change the collation elements for the full width Hangul compatibility characters, specifically the compatibility CV Johab Letters 3131-318E to use expansions in the default table. The UTC will further propose that 14651 do the same. [L2/02-280]WG20[92-C17] Consensus: The UTC is amenable to the concept of having optional pre-processing to handle half width compatibility jamo in collation. [L2/02-280]
[92-A36] Action Item for Mark Davis: Add a section to Unicode Technical Standard #10 Unicode Collation Algorithm on stability of weights for scripts.
[92-C18] Consensus: The UTC agrees that German sharp s should have a tertiary difference from "ss" instead of a secondary difference. This will be published on the issues list, with comments due by October 31, 2002.
[92-A37] Action Item for Mark Davis, Rick McGowan: Update the open issues list regarding the proposed change to default weighting for German sharp s, and follow the notification process.
[92-C19] Consensus: The UTC supports the goal of ensuring support for CLAUI related considerations in JTC1 standards, but disagrees with the "Paris 3" and "Paris 5" recommendations in document JTC 1 N 6744. [L2/02-320]Unicode Technical Reports - Character Mapping[92-A38] Action Item for Mark Davis: On behalf ot the UTC, forward the CLAUI consensus (92-C19) to the SC2 secretariat. [L2/02-320]
[92-C20] Consensus: The UTC is not in favor of pursuing the initiative on "Area Codes" documented in L2/02-321 (John Clews, document SC22/WG20 N941).
[92-M1] Motion: UTC approves the addition of a small section of text recommending that Unicode Technical Report #22 Character Mapping names be matched solely on the basis of A-Z, 0-9, caseless, disregarding leading zeroes.Unicode Technical Reports - Text BoundariesMoved by Mark Davis, seconded by Ken Whistler
9 for (Adobe, Apple, HP, IBM, Microsoft, RLG, Sybase, Sun, Unisys)
1 against (NCR)
0 abstain[92-A39] Action Item for Mark Davis, Editorial Committee: Add the proposed text recommending that Unicode Technical Report #22 Character Mapping names be matched solely on the basis of A-Z, 0-9, caseless, disregarding leading zeroes.
[92-A40] Action Item for Michael Kaplan: send example text to Mark for Draft Unicode Technical Report #29 Text Boundaries.[92-A41] Action Item for Mark Davis, Editorial Committee: Clarify the status statement of Unicode Standard Annexes regarding conformance to the standard.
[92-C21] Consensus: Bring the properties Grapheme Link, Grapheme Base, and Grapheme Extend into alignment with Draft Unicode Technical Report #29 Text Boundaries in the 4.0 time frame. Post an erratum warning about the inconsistencies, and discouraging their use until that time. [L2/02-304, 311]
[92-A42] Action Item for Mark Davis: Update the UCD files relating to the correcting inconsistencies in some grapheme properties (see 92-C21) for the 4.0 time frame. [L2/02-304, 311]
[92-A43] Action Item for Mark Davis: Provide text to Julie Allen for the text of Draft Unicode Technical Report #29 Text Boundaries. [L2/02-304, 311]
[92-A44] Action Item for Julie Allen: Post the erratum relating to inconsistencies in some grapheme properties (see 92-C21). [L2/02-304, 311]
PRESENT: Adobe Systems, Inc.; Apple Computer; Basis Technology; Hewlett Packard; IBM Corporation; Microsoft Corporation; NCR; RLG (by proxy); Sybase, Inc.; Unisys Corporation (by proxy).
NOT PRESENT: Government of India, MIT; Government of Pakistan, NLA; Justsystem Corp.; Oracle Corp.; PeopleSoft; Progress Software; Reuters, Ltd.; SAP AG; Sun Microsystems.
Total members represented: 10, Total not represented: 9
Unicode Technical Reports - Text Boundaries
[92-C22] Consensus: Add the French/Italian rule set from document L2/02-303 as anUnicode Technical Reports - Compression
example in Draft Unicode Technical Report #29 Text Boundaries and make a caveat about it breaking functionality in other languages that use apostrophe.[92-A45] Action Item for Mark Davis: Update Draft Unicode Technical Report #29 Text Boundaries with comments received in the meeting and post again as a draft after review by the Editorial Committee. [L2/02-303]
[92-C23] Consensus: Add a definition of "XML Suitable" and a recommendation that SCSU encoders should be "XML Suitable". [L2/02-262]Properties[92-A46] Action Item for Markus Scherer, Editorial Committee: Post a proposed update to Unicode Technical Standard #6 A Standard Compression Scheme for Unicode, adding the update on "XML Suitable". [L2/02-262]
[92-C24] Consensus: Correct two oversights in PropList.txt for U+034F and U+205F as specified in section 1.A of document L/02-267R3, and include in version 3.2.1.Unicode 3.2.1[92-A47] Action Item for Mark Davis: For Unicode 3.2.1, fix PropList.txt for U+034F and U+205F as specified in section 1.A of document L2/02-267R3.
[92-C25] Consensus: Change the properties of U+ 00AD soft hyphen to "Cf" and other ignorable; clarify that it has no rendering; clarify the Pd nature of U+058A and U+1806 and add annotations. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-A48] Action Item for Mark Davis, Ken Whistler: For Unicode 3.2.1, fix the properties of U+00AD soft hyphen and clarify the Pd nature of U+058A and U+1806 as specified in section 1.B of document L2/02-267R3, and produce an erratum for posting.
[92-A49] Action Item for Rick McGowan: Post the property erratum for U+00AD, U+058A and U+1806 when available. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-C26] Consensus: In addition to the erratum in version 3.2.1, for version 4, update the text of the standard and Unicode Standard Annex #14 Line Breaking Properties with the property change for U+00AD soft hyphen. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-A50] Action Item for Mark Davis, Editorial Committee: Update the text of the standard and Unicode Standard Annex #14 Line Breaking Properties for soft hyphen and related hyphens in version 4.0. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-A51] Action Item for Ken Whistler, Mark Davis: Update the general categories of the soft hyphen and related hyphens in the data files for Unicode 4.0. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-A52] Action Item for Mark Davis, Ken Whistler: Clarify the situation regarding the distinctions among characters that have no visible glyph for the November 2002 UTC. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-C27] Consensus: Change the general category of 02B9..02BA, 02C6..02CF from Sk to Lm for Unicode 4.0. See section 1.D.a of L2/02-267R3.
[92-A53] Action Item for Ken Whistler, Mark Davis: Change the general category of 02B9..02BA, 02C6..02CF to Sk in the data files for Unicode 4.0. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-C28] Consensus: In version 4, change the word/titlecase definitions in the text of the standard to match the word definitions from the approved version of Draft Unicode Technical Report #29 Text Boundaries. See section 1.D.b of L2/02-267R3.
[92-A54] Action Item for Mark Davis: Supply text to Julie Allen for 4.0 about titlecasing of strings. See 92-C28 and section 1.D.b of L2/02-267R3.
[92-C29] Consensus: In Unicode 4, introduce a new property ID_Start_Exceptions which contains the characters U+2118, U+212E, U+309B, U+309C. Add associated text explaining that UTC policy is that if characters are removed from ID_Start and ID_Continue they will be put in the exception class. This provides for backwards compatibility of identifiers. See section 1.E of L2/02-267R3.
[92-A55] Action Item for Mark Davis, Officers: Update the UTC policies to reflect consensus 92-C29 on backwards compatibility of identifiers. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-A56] Action Item for Mark Davis: Add the new ID_Start_Exceptions property containing the characters U+2118, U+212E, U+309B, U+309C for Unicode 4.0. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-A57] Action Item for Mark Davis, Editorial Committee: For Unicode version 4, change the text of chapter 5 appropriately to reflect the policy on maintaining backwards compatibility of identifiers. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-A58] Action Item for Editorial Committee: Document in Namelist.html the character encoding of the namelist file. For the other files, in Unicode 4.0 document the encoding of the Unicode data files.
[92-A59] Action Item for Mark Davis: Fix the description and property of U+0307 in SpecialCasing.txt in 3.2.1. See section 5.A of L2/02-267R3.
[92-C30] Consensus: For version 4, document in Unicode Standard Annex #21 Case Mappings that definition D1, condition 3 is redundant. See section 5.B of L2/02-267R3.
[92-A60] Action Item for Mark Davis, Editorial Committee: For version 4, update Unicode Standard Annex #21 Case Mappings to note that definition D1, condition 3 is redundant. See section 5.B of L2/02-267R3.
[92-C31] Consensus: For version 4, update the case folding in Unicode Standard Annex #21 Case Mappings, sections 1.4 and 2.5. See section 5.C of L2/02-267R3.
[92-M2] Motion: For version 4, put the lists of the three new properties (split, reordrant, subjoined) from section 6.A of L2/02-267R3 into the relevant block introductions.
Moved by Mark Davis, seconded by Peter Edberg
8 for (Adobe, Apple, HP, IBM, Microsoft, NCR, RLG, Sybase)
1 against (Basis)
1 abstain (Unisys)[92-A61] Action Item for Ken Whistler, Editorial Committee: Move the material in the three lists (split, reordrant, subjoined) from section 6.A of L2/02-267R3 into the relevant block introductions, for version 4.
[92-C32] Consensus: Add U+2047 DOUBLE QUESTION MARK to terminal punctuation in PropList.txt and add to the "Term" class defined in Draft Unicode Technical Report #29 Text Boundaries. See section 7.A of L2/02-267R3.
[92-A62] Action Item for Mark Davis: Add U+2047 DOUBLE QUESTION MARK to terminal punctuation in PropList.txt for version 3.2.1, and add to the "Term" class defined in Draft Unicode Technical Report #29 Text Boundaries. See section 7.A of L2/02-267R3.
[92-C33] Consensus: Delete "Non_Break" from PropertyValueAliases.txt and add "Block_Property" to PropertyValueAliases.txt. See sections 8.A, 8.B of L2/02-267R3.
[92-A63] Action Item for Mark Davis: Delete "Non_Break" from PropertyValueAliases.txt and add "Block_Property" to PropertyValueAliases.txt for version 3.2.1. See sections 8.A, 8.B of L2/02-267R3.
[92-A64] Action Item for Asmus Freytag: Use the information in section 4 of L2/02-267R3 and make a proposed update for Unicode Standard Annex #14 Line Breaking Properties, to be available for comment before the November meeting, and incorporated into version 4
[92-C34] Consensus: For version 4, add the Numerical, Radical/Stroke, & Source Reference PropertyAliases.txt and PropertyValueAliases.txt as normative properties, and create a "provisional" property and state that all other Unihan tags are provisional. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-A65] Action Item for Mark Davis, John Jenkins: For version 4, add the Numerical, Radical/Stroke, & Source Reference PropertyAliases.txt and PropertyValueAliases.txt as normative properties, and create a "provisional" property and state that all other Unihan tags are provisional. [L2/02-267R3]
[92-A66] Action Item for Peter Edberg: Discuss with John Jenkins if other Unihan tag properties could be improved to the point at which they could become informative rather than provisional.
[92-C35] Consensus: The UTC authorizes the Editorial Committee to release version 3.2.1 containing property fixes and any other errata to the data files.Assessing Unicode Support[92-A67] Action Item for Mark Davis, Ken Whistler, Editorial Committee: Prepare a version 3.2.1 beta ASAP, and release 3.2.1 upon completion of the beta period, targeting the first of October.
[92-A68] Action Item for Mark Davis: Separate document L2/02-305, on assessing Unicode support, into two parts; the definitional part should be moved into Unicode 4.0. Update the remaining portions of L2/02-305 and post for comments.W3C
[92-C36] Consensus: The UTC has misgivings about over reliance on early, uniform normalization, and will convey that to the Internationalization Working Group in W3C.[92-A69] Action Item for Mark Davis, Michel Suignard: Convey the UTC's misgivings about over reliance on early uniform normalization to the Internationalization Working Group in W3C.
[92-A70] Action Item for Mark Davis: Write a paper for W3C regarding canonical equivalence, early and late normalization.
| Attendees: | Representing: |
| Joan Aliprand | RLG |
| Debbie Anderson | UC Berkeley |
| Mark Davis | IBM |
| Asmus Freytag | Basis |
| Deborah Goldsmith | Apple |
| Hideki Hiura | Sun |
| Michael Kaplan | Microsoft |
| Mike Ksar | SC2/WG2 |
| Rick McGowan | Unicode |
| Lisa Moore | IBM |
| Eric Muller | Adobe |
| Maria | PeopleSoft |
| Gabriel Plumlee | PeopleSoft |
| Lynn Ruggles | HP |
| Murray Sargent | Microsoft |
| Michel Suignard | Microsoft |
| Ken Whistler | Sybase |
| Cathy Wissink | Microsoft |
Member |
|
|
|
|
| 1. Adobe Systems, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
| 2. Apple Computer, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
| 3. Basis Technology |
|
|
|
|
| 4. Gov't of India, MIT | ||||
| 5. Gov't of Pakistan, NLA | ||||
| 6. Hewlett Packard | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| 7. IBM Corporation |
|
|
|
|
| 8. Justsystem Corporation | yes |
|
|
|
| 9. Microsoft Corporation |
|
|
|
|
| 10. NCR Corporation | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| 11. Oracle Corporation |
|
|
|
|
| 12. PeopleSoft |
|
|
|
|
| 13. Progress Software |
|
|
|
|
| 14. RLG, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
| 15. Reuters, Ltd. | ||||
| 16. SAP AG |
|
|
||
| 17. Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
| 18. Sybase, Inc. |
|
yes | yes | yes |
| 19. Unisys |
|
|
|
|