unicode@Unicode.ORG writes:
> I'm glad to see whois++ people endorsing Unicode. There was resistance
> to the idea back during the early whois++ discussions several
> years ago.
I also think it is a good move to go into the big character sets,
but I think that you should call it ISO 10646 or UCS. UNICODE
is in principle a proprietary standard. And encodings like
UTF-8 are not UNICODE, but is 10646 and may well have
a significant role to play in whois++
Keld Simonsen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:30 EDT