Re: Unicode, Cure-all or Kill-all?

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Sat Aug 10 1996 - 08:30:08 EDT


At 01:14 1996-08-10, Jonathen Rosenne wrote:
>A standard should be based on existing technology.

But ISO10646 and Unicode have, since their inception, been expanded, and
as-yet-unimplemented schemes have been standardized.

>Unicode, to the best of my knowledge, is based on prior implemented technology.
>Some of the OSI standards were innovations, and aren't getting very far
>especially when compared with the TCP/IP alternatives.

The sources used in ISO 10646 can be found in Annex L of the standard. The
sources used in Unicode pp. 645-649 of Volume 1.

>People should not expect standards to solve technology problems. Standards
>should be aimed at standartisation problems, i.e. when several products
>implement similar technologies in incompatible ways.

I disagree. If we can get standardization working efficiently enough, we
could (in some fields) lead implementations.

--
Michael Everson, Everson Gunn Teoranta
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire (Ireland)
Guth�in:  +353 1 478-2597, +353 1 283-9396
http://www.indigo.ie/egt
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn; Baile an Bh�thair; Co. �tha Cliath; �ire



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:31 EDT