Keld> We did talk about how to handle language codes in CEN when
Keld> we looked at how to specify the locale name syntax for the
Keld> CEN cultural registry, and there our decision was to follow
Keld> the POSIX and X/Open tradition to use the ISO 639 names,
Keld> just as the internet RFC earlier mentioned. For languages
Keld> our proposal was to use the maintenance mechanism of ISO 639
Keld> instead of turning to other mechanisms. In that way we would
Keld> keep all the standards involved consistent and aligned, and
Keld> the maintenance of ISO 639 is a quite expedient way to have
Keld> these specifications full normative ISO standard status -
Keld> new codes can become full ISO standard state after about 3
Keld> months from the proposal. We are in CEN planning to propose
Keld> a number of new language codes, for the European languages
Keld> that we are working on right now.
Keld> I think introducing a Unicode language identifier would mess
Keld> up the consensus that there is now on using ISO 639 as the
Keld> prime identifier standard for languages.
From our perspective, if ISO 639 were to adopt a significant selection
from the Ethnologue list of languages, it would be much easier to
accept as a reference to work from.
Are you aware of any proposals to significantly increase the coverage
of ISO 639?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
mleisher@crl.nmsu.edu
Mark Leisher "The trick is not gaining the knowledge,
Computing Research Lab but surviving the lessons."
New Mexico State University -- "Svaha," Charles de Lint
Box 30001, Dept. 3CRL
Las Cruces, NM 88003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:32 EDT