Re: Mayan, Rongo-Rongo (was Re: Etruscan)

From: Michael Everson (everson@indigo.ie)
Date: Wed Nov 05 1997 - 14:55:27 EST


Ar 10:15 -0800 1997-11-05, scríobh Kenneth Whistler:
>My answer would be:
>
>This is an example of Mayan:
>
> 12 78
> 34 9A
> 56 BC
>
> Fig. 1
>
>It speaks about ...
>
>When embedding Mayan text in Latin (as opposed to embedding a
>figure showing formatted Mayan text in formatted Latin text),
>I would propose instead:
>
>This is an example of Mayan: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. It speaks
>about ...

I think that if Mayanists could do either of these conveniently they'd be
really really happy. :-) But note that unlike Mongolian the Mayan
glyph-blocks would always maintain their vertical orientation in such an
arrangement.

Thinking about it, I think the following would be what they would do:

>This is an example of Mayan: 12 34 56 78 9A BC. It speaks
>about ...

>We don't need to go to schemes as exotic as layout of Mayan
>hieroglyphs to grasp the basic principle that mixing vertical layout
>and horizontal layout shouldn't follow the kind of model set
>for bidirectional layout.

Definitely correct.

--
Michael Everson, EGT * http://www.indigo.ie/egt
15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire (Ireland)
Gutháin:  +353 1 478-2597, +353 1 283-9396
27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Co. Átha Cliath; Éire



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:37 EDT