John,
I think I detect a couple of typos:
>27 40 F Set G0 to the 94-character set F
>27 41 F Set G1 to the 94-character set F
>27 42 F Set G2 to the 94-character set F
>27 43 F Set G3 to the 94-character set F
>27 45 F Set G1 to the 96-character set F
>27 46 F Set G3 to the 96-character set F
>27 47 F Set G3 to the 96-character set F
***** there are two G3s and no G2s described...
>27 36 F Set G0 to the 94 x 94 character set F,
provided F is 64, 65, or 66
>27 36 40 F Set G0 to the 94 x 94 character set F,
provided F is not 64, 65, or 66
>27 36 41 F Set G1 to the 94 x 94 character set F
>27 36 42 F Set G3 to the 94 x 94 character set F
>27 36 43 F Set G3 to the 94 x 94 character set F
***** there are two G3s and no G2s described...
As someone who did a 2022 implementation in 1984,
with all kinds of character set designations and
invocations, and figuring out what had been used,
guessing what would be used, I have to say, it
pretty much seemed a miracle that we ever got
the right character displayed at the right time.
The mentality of stacks of character sets to
swap around is a downright psychedelic thought...
From a Unicode believer,
Lisa
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:37 EDT