Re: LC_CTYPE locale category and character sets.

From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Mon Jul 27 1998 - 10:23:39 EDT

Next message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Bitstream Cyberbit"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Uppercase Sharp-S? (was: locale category and character sets)"
Maybe in reply to: Christophe PIERRET: "LC_CTYPE locale category and character sets."
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: LC_CTYPE locale category and character sets."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John Cowan wrote:

>(Similar things were done with the Thai block, which is essentially
a transcription of TIS 620, even though that standard is
highly non-Unicode in flavor.)

Could you please explain your statement that similar things were done
in the Thai block (similar to what was done with Turkish dotted i). In
what respects is the Thai block non-Unicode in flavour?

Next message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Bitstream Cyberbit"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Uppercase Sharp-S? (was: locale category and character sets)"
Maybe in reply to: Christophe PIERRET: "LC_CTYPE locale category and character sets."
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: LC_CTYPE locale category and character sets."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:40 EDT