Re: CCCII and CNS questions

From: Werner LEMBERG (sx0005@sx2.hrz.uni-dortmund.de)
Date: Thu Jan 14 1999 - 03:30:17 EST


   Almost normative. The real CCCII is defined in

   [...]

   in Taiwan, ROC. I've found very few differences there...

What kind of differences?

>A quick check with the ISO character set registry shows that the CNS
>fonts look identically,

   Really? Does "7847" in CNS plane 1 of your font look like this?
        ,, ,, ,,
        ;;;;' ;;;,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;;,
        ;;; ;;; ;;;'
        ;;; ;;;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;
        ;;; ,, ;;; ;;;
   ;, ;;; ;;;' ;;;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;
    ;; ;;; ;;' '' ,, ,,
    ;;; ;;;;' ;;;' ;;;'
     ;; ;;; ,,,,,,;;;,,,,,,;;;,,,;;,
        ;;; ;;; ;;;
        ;;; ;;; ;;; ,,
        ;;; '''''';;;'''''''';;'''''''
       ;;; ,;;' ;;,, ';,,
       ;;;;, ,;;',, ;;; ,,';;;,,,
      ,;;' ;;, ,;;' ;;, ;;; ,;;'' ';;''
      ;;; ;;;, '' ;;;''
     ,;; ;;; ,,,;'' ;;;'';,,,
    ,;; ' ;;;;;'' ;;; ';;;,
   ,;' ';; '''';;;; ';;
   ' ;;'

This is character `8839' in IR 171... No, the bitmap I have is not
identical -- it has the `water' radical instead for this character.
But the latest corrections to IR 171 are dated from 1994-Jul-07, while
the bitmaps are from 1994-Mar-09, so this may be one of the
corrections. Who is responsible for this? Can someone give detailed
information?

    Werner



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:44 EDT