Almost normative. The real CCCII is defined in
[...]
in Taiwan, ROC. I've found very few differences there...
What kind of differences?
>A quick check with the ISO character set registry shows that the CNS
>fonts look identically,
Really? Does "7847" in CNS plane 1 of your font look like this?
,, ,, ,,
;;;;' ;;;,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;;,
;;; ;;; ;;;'
;;; ;;;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;
;;; ,, ;;; ;;;
;, ;;; ;;;' ;;;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;
;; ;;; ;;' '' ,, ,,
;;; ;;;;' ;;;' ;;;'
;; ;;; ,,,,,,;;;,,,,,,;;;,,,;;,
;;; ;;; ;;;
;;; ;;; ;;; ,,
;;; '''''';;;'''''''';;'''''''
;;; ,;;' ;;,, ';,,
;;;;, ,;;',, ;;; ,,';;;,,,
,;;' ;;, ,;;' ;;, ;;; ,;;'' ';;''
;;; ;;;, '' ;;;''
,;; ;;; ,,,;'' ;;;'';,,,
,;; ' ;;;;;'' ;;; ';;;,
,;' ';; '''';;;; ';;
' ;;'
This is character `8839' in IR 171... No, the bitmap I have is not
identical -- it has the `water' radical instead for this character.
But the latest corrections to IR 171 are dated from 1994-Jul-07, while
the bitmaps are from 1994-Mar-09, so this may be one of the
corrections. Who is responsible for this? Can someone give detailed
information?
Werner
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:44 EDT