Johab and single Jamo

From: Kevin Bracey (kbracey@e-14.com)
Date: Tue Feb 23 1999 - 11:15:32 EST

Next message: ECS: "Unicode support by email clients"
Previous message: Misha Wolf: "14th Unicode Conference, March 1999, Boston -- 2nd reminder"
Next in thread: Jungshik Shin: "Re: Johab and single Jamo"
Maybe reply: Jungshik Shin: "Re: Johab and single Jamo"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I'm implementing a Korean Johab<->Unicode conversion routine for our systems,
but I don't have a copy of KS X 1001, so I've been relying on Mr Lunde's
latest blockbuster and http://pantheon.yale.edu/~jshin/faq/JOHAB.TXT.gz

Neither are totally clear on the encoding of single Jamo consonants.
Johab 8841 is definitely the single letter "K" (U+3131), encoded as
K-filler-filler, and 8444 is definitely "KS" (U+3133), encoded as
filler-filler-KS.

But is 8442 (filler-filler-K) a valid alternative representation of "K"?

Thanks in advance,

-- 
Kevin Bracey, Senior Software Engineer
Acorn Computers Ltd                           Tel: +44 (0) 1223 725228
Acorn House, 645 Newmarket Road               Fax: +44 (0) 1223 725328
Cambridge, CB5 8PB, United Kingdom            WWW: http://www.acorn.co.uk/

Next message: ECS: "Unicode support by email clients"
Previous message: Misha Wolf: "14th Unicode Conference, March 1999, Boston -- 2nd reminder"
Next in thread: Jungshik Shin: "Re: Johab and single Jamo"
Maybe reply: Jungshik Shin: "Re: Johab and single Jamo"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:44 EDT