On Sat, 8 May 1999, Becker, Joseph wrote:
> > I gather things are now better in 3.0 with the Devanagari 'eyelash
> > RA'. Where do they stand with my suggestion about the RA consonant
> > (U+0930) followed by the vowel sign vocalic R ...
>
> Jim,
>
> Hi, your faithful editors have added to v3.0 a new Consonant RA Rule:
>
> --------------------------------
>
> R4a The superscript mark RA[sup] has a special use in representing
> consonant RA with vocalic R.
>
> RA[n] + R[vs] -> R[n] + RA[sup]
>
> --------------------------------
>
> As usual, the [] notation here indicates subscript.
>
> Joe
>
Tuesday, May 11, 1999
Joe, et al,
Bravo! I applaud the faithful editors. It looks fine. "Triffles
make perfection but perfection is no triffle." I'm now a specialist
member, but this means I need not try to attend the UTC meeting June 8-11
which is about when my first grandchild is due. I'm sure my daughter, her
husband and the doctor would do fine without me, but it's a milestone.
Many thanks,
Jim Agenbroad ( jage@LOC.gov )
The above are purely personal opinions, not necessarily the official
views of any government or any agency of any.
Phone: 202 707-9612; Fax: 202 707-0955; US mail: I.T.S. Dev.Gp.4, Library
of Congress, 101 Independence Ave. SE, Washington, D.C. 20540-9334 U.S.A.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:46 EDT