On Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:39:53 -0700 (PDT), Ricardo Bermell-Benet wrote:
>Just one more point.
>
>What about U+2208 "ELEMENT OF" and U+220A "SMALL ELEMENT OF"?
>Two gliphs differenciated only in their stylus (particularly,
>their size) but two separated characters!
I guess, they had different code points in an existing character set
standard. So the difference has been preserved for backward
compatibility.
-- Torsten Mohrin Sharmahd Computing GmbH, Hannover, Germany Phone: +49-511-13780, Fax: +49-511-13450 http://www.sharmahd.com, mohrin@sharmahd.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:47 EDT