Mark Davis scripsit:
> It sounds like you are suggesting that whenever a letter could collate
> differently, it should be cloned. That would end up with a muddle of visually
> identical characters, especially for Latin. There would be at least three copies
> of a-diaeresis, for example.
But this argument proves too much. LATIN LETTER THORN is a clone of
RUNIC LETTER THORN, but when Runic was added, nobody suggested
unifying them. CYRILLIC LETTERs KU and WE should likewise be
disunified.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT