Re: 100% (was Re: Unicode 3.0 press statements)

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Wed Jan 26 2000 - 14:55:36 EST

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: 100%"
Previous message: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: 100% (was Re: Unicode 3.0 press statements)"
Maybe in reply to: John Clews: "100% (was Re: Unicode 3.0 press statements)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Yung-Fong Tang wrote:

> Buginese- Celebes, Indonesia, 2.5 million speakers [page 237]

Buginese script is not in Unicode 3.0. Can Buginese be
written in other scripts?

> Javanese- Java, Indonesia, 75 million speakers [page 234]

Javanese is usually written in Latin script, but can be
written in Arabic script.

> Nakhi- Yunnan, China, 230 thousand people [page 217]

Naxi script is not in Unicode 3.0

> Sibo- northwestern China, 40 thousand people [page 216]

Sibo is written in Mongolian script.

-- 
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: 100%"
Previous message: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: 100% (was Re: Unicode 3.0 press statements)"
Maybe in reply to: John Clews: "100% (was Re: Unicode 3.0 press statements)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:58 EDT