Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro
From: Roozbeh Pournader (roozbeh@sina.sharif.ac.ir)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2000 - 16:20:40 EST
- Next message: Jungshik Shin: "Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro (bis)"
- Previous message: A. Vine: "Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro (bis)"
- Maybe in reply to: Tim Greenwood: "8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro"
- Next in thread: Erik van der Poel: "Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro"
- Reply: Erik van der Poel: "Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Erik van der Poel wrote:
> I don't know how many people still use xterm to process email and HTML
> documents, but I suspect they are a minority by now.
Please let's try to support the minority also. That's the reason behind
wide support of Mac and Linux. Aren't they the minority?
As an example, there was a time I was using Netscape for reading email,
but recently, I have returned to pine.
> I believe the more recent versions of xterm support UTF-8.
Yes. But it's not widely used. Users usually install all that's available
from their Linux distribution CD. And few distributions include that new
xterm.
- Next message: Jungshik Shin: "Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro (bis)"
- Previous message: A. Vine: "Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro (bis)"
- Maybe in reply to: Tim Greenwood: "8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro"
- Next in thread: Erik van der Poel: "Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro"
- Reply: Erik van der Poel: "Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2
: Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:58 EDT