Re: Vulgar fractions

From: Christopher John Fynn (cfynn@dircon.co.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 11 2000 - 18:23:15 EST

Next message: Frank da Cruz: "Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro"
Previous message: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: Vulgar fractions (was: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro)"
Maybe in reply to: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: Vulgar fractions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Since modern rendering systems can allow clients to display the characters
"1" "/" "3" by a single "1/3" glyph, there is certainly no need for
additional vulgar fraction characters in Unicode.

- Chris

Next message: Frank da Cruz: "Re: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro"
Previous message: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: Vulgar fractions (was: 8859-1, 8859-15, 1252 and Euro)"
Maybe in reply to: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: Vulgar fractions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT