I don't think I disagree with you, but just the same;
the missing French and Finnish characters are much more important
than '1/2', '1/4' in 8859-15 :)
gtx, Rein
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>
>
>On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein] wrote:
>
>> why are '1/2', '1/4' and '3/4 not available [or partly] in the
>> other 'Latin' alphabets??
>
>Because there are more important alphabetic characters in those Latins,
>you know.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT