Re: Rationale wanted for Unicode identifier rules

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Mon Mar 13 2000 - 10:15:51 EST

Next message: Alain LaBonté : "English Virtual Academy (EVA) (^;"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Rationale wanted for Unicode identifier rules"
Maybe in reply to: John Cowan: "Rationale wanted for Unicode identifier rules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Yves Arrouye wrote:

> (I take it that the last part after the comma is "a Unicode 3.0 generator")

No, 4.0 is correct (see previous posting).

> Or would this not be
> considered generation of symbols (it's a pass-through, so I'd say it's not
> generation myself)?

Exactly.

-- 
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

Next message: Alain LaBonté : "English Virtual Academy (EVA) (^;"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Rationale wanted for Unicode identifier rules"
Maybe in reply to: John Cowan: "Rationale wanted for Unicode identifier rules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT