Re: IME of Devanagari

• Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Case insensitive comparisions"
• Previous message: Keld Jørn Simonsen: "Re: Case insensitive comparisions"
• Maybe in reply to: Shigeki Moro: "IME of Devanagari"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:00:03 -0800 (PST)
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> wrote:

> Is there, after all, a "traditional Japanese way of typesetting Devanagari"?
> The Unicode Consortium is on record (see
> http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr11, which is officially part of
> Unicode 3.0) as saying there is not.

I think there are no ways. When we write a scholary articles, we
populary do romanization with several diacritical marks. We rarely have
to type Devanagari characters to handle and investigate Indian old
manuscripts.

Regards,

Shigeki Moro
moro@ya.sakura.ne.jp
http://www.ya.sakura.ne.jp/~moro/

• Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Case insensitive comparisions"
• Previous message: Keld Jørn Simonsen: "Re: Case insensitive comparisions"
• Maybe in reply to: Shigeki Moro: "IME of Devanagari"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:00 EDT