Re: Double Byte enabled

• Next message: John O'Conner: "Tibetan Digits"
• Previous message: Suzanne Topping: "Double Byte enabled"
• Maybe in reply to: Suzanne Topping: "Double Byte enabled"
• Next in thread: John O'Conner: "Re: Double Byte enabled"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Suzanne Topping asked:

>
> Does the term "double-byte enabled" accurately describe Unicode-based apps?

Nope.

> Seems antiquated and inaccurate.

Yep.

>
> I'm editing a document which says something about making sure applications
> are double-byte enabled, and I'd like to come up with a more appropriate and
> current phrase.
>
> I assume there is a better term, but I can't think of what has really
> replaced it. Perhaps even "multi-byte enabled"?
>
> Any ideas?

How about "Unicode enabled"?

--Ken

• Next message: John O'Conner: "Tibetan Digits"
• Previous message: Suzanne Topping: "Double Byte enabled"
• Maybe in reply to: Suzanne Topping: "Double Byte enabled"
• Next in thread: John O'Conner: "Re: Double Byte enabled"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:00 EDT