Re: Problems/Issues with CJK and Unicode

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 12:55:55 EDT

Next message: Magda Danish (Unicode): "Unicode UCS-4 character tables"
Previous message: James E. Agenbroad: "Re: Vedic Characters & Unicode (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: Mark.Conover@luminant.com: "Problems/Issues with CJK and Unicode"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Problems/Issues with CJK and Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John Jenkins wrote:

> All of them had them. Even though many of them aren't words -- that is,
> couldn't be used in a sentence all by themselves -- they all got encoded
> anyway.

I am confused. All 214 KangXi radicals were already encoded in URO 2.0?
I thought that only some of them were already encoded there, and are therefore
duplicated between the KangXi block and the URO.

-- 
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

Next message: Magda Danish (Unicode): "Unicode UCS-4 character tables"
Previous message: James E. Agenbroad: "Re: Vedic Characters & Unicode (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: Mark.Conover@luminant.com: "Problems/Issues with CJK and Unicode"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Problems/Issues with CJK and Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:01 EDT