On Wed, 17 May 2000, Doug Ewell wrote:
> This means, of course, that his famous personal-name logo, sometimes
> used as the canonical example of the type of "idiosyncratic, personal,
> novel" character that Unicode pledges not to encode, is now obsolete.
> Just another reason why such logos are not suitable for encoding.
It would still be of historical use. :P
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:02 EDT