Re: Should furigana be considered part of "plain text"?

From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Mon Jul 03 2000 - 09:57:06 EDT


On 07/02/2000 09:16:36 AM <dewell@compuserve.com> wrote:

>The problem with the phrase "plain text ceases to be plain if you decide
that
>layout information needs to be encoded" is the word "layout." In the
broadest
>sense, line and paragraph separation could be considered "layout," and
nobody
>would suggest doing away with the plain-text characters needed to control
those
>functions.

Line separation is layout, but paragraph separation is part of the semantic
content.

- Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@sil.org>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:05 EDT