RE: 127 strokes beyond the radical?!

• Next message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Unicode in VFAT file system"
• Previous message: Jonathan Rosenne: "RE: Unicode in VFAT file system"
• Maybe in reply to: 11digitboy@bolt.com: "127 strokes beyond the radical?!"
• Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: 127 strokes beyond the radical?!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Patrick Andries wrote:
> De : <11digitboy@bolt.com>
> > On page 876, the character U+6B8B is listed as being
> > 127 strokes beyond the radical. I'd say it's more
> > like 6 strokes beyond the radical.
>
> I believe it to be 5 strokes and it is already listed under
> radical + 5
> strokes.

Funny: it is +6 strokes in some fonts (e.g. Arial Unicode MS) and +5 in
others (e.g. SimSun).
But definitely not +127 strokes!

_ Marco

• Next message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Unicode in VFAT file system"
• Previous message: Jonathan Rosenne: "RE: Unicode in VFAT file system"
• Maybe in reply to: 11digitboy@bolt.com: "127 strokes beyond the radical?!"
• Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: 127 strokes beyond the radical?!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT