RE: 127 strokes beyond the radical?!

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Jul 21 2000 - 15:32:21 EDT


At 03:42 AM 7/21/00 -0800, Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com wrote:
>Patrick Andries wrote:
> > De : <11digitboy@bolt.com>
> > > On page 876, the character U+6B8B is listed as being
> > > 127 strokes beyond the radical. I'd say it's more
> > > like 6 strokes beyond the radical.
> >
> > I believe it to be 5 strokes and it is already listed under
> > radical + 5
> > strokes.

If you read the book, it's listed under 6, not 5.

>Funny: it is +6 strokes in some fonts (e.g. Arial Unicode MS) and +5 in
>others (e.g. SimSun).
>But definitely not +127 strokes!

This is an erratum.

A./



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT