Octet vs byte (was Unicode FAQ Addendum)

From: Patrick Andries (pandries@iti.qc.ca)
Date: Sun Jul 23 2000 - 00:58:39 EDT


----- Message d'origine -----
De : "Doug Ewell" <dewell@compuserve.com>
À : "Unicode List" <unicode@unicode.org>
Envoyé : 22 juillet, 2000 21:24
Objet : Re: Unicode FAQ addendum

> John G. Otto, alias "jgo" <john@nisus.com>, wrote:
>
> >> Addison wrote:
> >> 1. 1 byte != 1 character: deal with it.
> >
> > Hmm, depends on how you define "byte".
> > I've seen them in 8-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit and 18-bit varieties.
>
> True, and there have also been 6-bit and 9-bit bytes. However, in an
> age when many people are ready to consign "relics" like floppy disks,
> dial-up Internet connections, and character-cell graphics to the legacy
> trash heap, I think it is safe to assume that the word "byte" refers to
> exactly 8 bits, and ignore all other possible values.

Or simply use octet which is unambiguous.

Definition 4.27 (ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000(E)) : « An ordered sequence of eight
bits considered as a unit. » The English version of ISO 10646 does not
define or use the word « byte »

Pigheaded French guys insisting upon new words in French to describe what
already exist in English sometimes can enrich other languages by
« ricochet » when a new word is needed ;-)

Patrick Andries
Dorval (Québec)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT