Re: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs

From: John H. Jenkins ([email protected])
Date: Mon Jul 24 2000 - 22:54:30 EDT

Next message: [email protected]: "FW: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs"
Previous message: Jianping Yang: "Re: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs"
Maybe in reply to: Mikko Lahti: "Oracle and Surrogate Pairs"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "FW: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Does the field in question need to support literally any possible character
> in Unicode 3.0 and beyond (since 3.0 does not have any surrogates
> assigned!)?
>
>

True, but within a year or so, there *will* be surrogates assigned in Unicode. One cannot be premature in supporting them at this point.

=====
John H. Jenkins
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng

Next message: [email protected]: "FW: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs"
Previous message: Jianping Yang: "Re: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs"
Maybe in reply to: Mikko Lahti: "Oracle and Surrogate Pairs"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "FW: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT