Re: Plane 1 math characters

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Tue Jul 25 2000 - 11:41:43 EDT

Next message: pierre vaures: "Japanese && US application II"
Previous message: Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com: "RE: What is "Unicode" in Chinese?"
Maybe in reply to: Doug Ewell: "Plane 1 math characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Doug Ewell wrote:

> I'm probably taking this a bit too seriously, but I remember a big,
> heated debate about encoding these characters in which some high Unicode
> guru assured us they were not intended for the use to which Mark just
> put them.

That was the point about my complaint that _n_, _o_, and _t_ didn't have
definitions, so I was unable to compute their product _not_.

-- 
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

Next message: pierre vaures: "Japanese && US application II"
Previous message: Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com: "RE: What is "Unicode" in Chinese?"
Maybe in reply to: Doug Ewell: "Plane 1 math characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT