RE: TUS 3.0, Figure 2-1 >error?

• Next message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Digits (Was: What a difference a glyph makes...)"
• Previous message: Abdul Malik: "Re: Bangla(Bengali) letter Missing"
• Maybe in reply to: Jaap Pranger: "TUS 3.0, Figure 2-1 >error?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jaap Pranger noted,

>In case it was intended to have grapheme and chars correspond
>in TUS 3.0, figure 2-1, the devanagari example does not comply.

Yes, there is a known error in Figure 2-1. We will be posting a
list of known errata (for the figures and text) for 3.0 next week.
It will be in the usual place
http://www.unicode.org/unicode/uni2errata/UnicodeErrata.html

Julie Allen
Editor
Unicode, Inc.

• Next message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Digits (Was: What a difference a glyph makes...)"
• Previous message: Abdul Malik: "Re: Bangla(Bengali) letter Missing"
• Maybe in reply to: Jaap Pranger: "TUS 3.0, Figure 2-1 >error?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT