RE: Summary: xml:lang validity and RFC 1766 refs to outdated

• Next message: James Kass: "Re: Braille rendering of Unicode [OT 50%]"
• Previous message: Roozbeh Pournader: "RE: Arabic shaping behavior questions"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> I don't see anything in RFC 1766 that hardcodes it to the
> 1988 versions of either 639 or 3166.

I have taken this discussion off the Unicode list. I only started the thread
here because I was referencing an earlier post and because ISO 639 language
code updates were topical a couple months ago. It's not particularly
relevant to Unicode.

For those who are interested, my xml-dev post on 08 Aug 2000, archived at
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200008/msg00279.html, and David
Brownell's xml-dev post on 09 Aug 2000, archived at
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200008/msg00305.html, should lay it to
rest.

Thanks

   - Mike
____________________________________________________________________
Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources:
webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://www.skew.org/xml/

• Next message: James Kass: "Re: Braille rendering of Unicode [OT 50%]"
• Previous message: Roozbeh Pournader: "RE: Arabic shaping behavior questions"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT