Re: Tamil glyphs

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2000 - 18:11:59 EDT


Actually, Apurva just did explain it.... and since she comes from a
typography background she did explain how the whole problem can be handled
via fonts. :-)

However, it cannot currently be handled by Unicode. You must choose the
proper font to display NNA AI, NNNA AI, LA AI, or LLA AI. The Monotype font
and Latha in Windows 2000 are the way that my client got both display types.

michka

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick McGowan" <rmcgowan@apple.com>
To: "Unicode List" <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: Tamil glyphs

>
> "Michael (michka) Kaplan" <michka@trigeminal.com> wrote:
>
> > There is one thing missing in the Unicode Standard, and it can be
> > found in #5 on ligatures (unchanged from Unicode 2.0). The behavior
> > described there is only one of *two* desired possibilities.
>
> This is starting to sound like a deficiency in the block intro --
something that should be documented more clearly, if there are indeed to
common represenetations that are desired.
>
> Can you expound upon precisely what the problem is, as you perceive it?
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:13 EDT