Re: Unicode on a non-Unicode web page

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Fri Sep 08 2000 - 10:53:34 EDT

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: Surrogate support in *ML?"
Previous message: J%ORG KNAPPEN: "Re: Win32: Commandline/batch ANSI-UTF8-UTF16-UTF8-ANSI conversion"
Maybe in reply to: Gary P. Grosso: "Unicode on a non-Unicode web page"
Next in thread: Helena Shih: "RE: Unicode on a non-Unicode web page"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John Wilcock wrote:

> ش Sarasvati, might I humbly request that this behaviour be reinstated

And I even more humbly request that it *not* be reinstated. Rather
than reiterating the arguments, I will point to Chip Rosenthal's
"Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful" at
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html , which is hereby
incorporated by reference, as the lawyers say.

In the interests of fair play, I will also point to Simon Hill's
"Reply-To Munging Considered Useful" at
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml .

-- 
There is / one art                   || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less                    || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things                   || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness                 \\ -- Piet Hein

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: Surrogate support in *ML?"
Previous message: J%ORG KNAPPEN: "Re: Win32: Commandline/batch ANSI-UTF8-UTF16-UTF8-ANSI conversion"
Maybe in reply to: Gary P. Grosso: "Unicode on a non-Unicode web page"
Next in thread: Helena Shih: "RE: Unicode on a non-Unicode web page"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:13 EDT