Re: Reply-To mess opinion [was Re: Unicode on a non-Unicode

• Next message: Martin J. Duerst: "Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-duerst-i18n-norm-04.txt"
• Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Sun, 10 Sep 2000 04:39:22 -0800 (GMT-0800), Harald Alvestrand
wrote:
> I have the opposite experience from Simon Hill: Most reply-to munging lists
> get regular complaints, those that don't do it don't want it.

My experience is that the complaints arise when the list
*systematically* adds a Reply-To, overwriting any reply-to that may
have been set by the sender.

Lists which add a Reply-To if and only if the original message *does
not* contain this header are, in my experience, trouble-free.

John.

-- 
-- Over 1200 webcams from ski resorts around the world - http://www.tradoc.fr/john/webcams/
-- Translate your technical documents and web pages    - http://www.tradoc.fr/en/

• Next message: Martin J. Duerst: "Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-duerst-i18n-norm-04.txt"
• Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:13 EDT