Re: BCP 19, RFC 2978 on IANA Charset Registration Procedures

From: Misha Wolf (misha.wolf@reuters.com)
Date: Mon Oct 23 2000 - 10:54:08 EDT


Ed,

Are you addressing me? All I did is forward the RFC notification.

Misha

[This mail was written using voice recognition software]

> Please update the reference to ISO/IEC 10646-1: 2000, which ISO has recently
> published and made available. It includes 31 amendments and 3 corrigenda to
> the first (1993) edition.
>
> Adding an optional mapping to 10646 is a good idea. FYI, ISO is in the
> process of revising ISO 2375 (coded character set registration according to
> ISO/IEC 2022) to add the option of a 10646 mapping. However, the draft
> revision to 2375 specifies that the mapping is subject to a review process
> because we expect that implementers may be depending on such mappings.
>
> Ed Hart
>
> Edwin F. Hart
> edwin.hart@jhuapl.edu
> The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
> 11100 Johns Hopkins Road
> Laurel, MD 20723-6099
> USA
> +1-443-778-6926 (Baltimore area)
> +1-240-228-6926 (Washington, DC area)
> +1-443-778-1093 (fax)
> +1-240-228-1093 (fax)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Misha Wolf [mailto:misha.wolf@reuters.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 13:53
> To: Unicode List
> Subject: Re: BCP 19, RFC 2978 on IANA Charset Registration Procedures
>
>
>
>
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
> BCP 19
> RFC 2978
>
> Title: IANA Charset Registration Procedures
> Author(s): N. Freed, J. Postel
> Status: Best Current Practice
> Date: October 2000
> Mailbox: ned.freed@innosoft.com
> Pages: 11
> Characters: 21615
> Obsoletes: 2278
>
> I-D Tag: draft-freed-charset-regist-03.txt
>
> URL: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2978.txt
>
>
> Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) (RFC-2045, RFC-2046,
> RFC-2047, RFC-2184) and various other Internet protocols are capable
> of using many different charsets. This in turn means that the ability
> to label different charsets is essential.
>
> Note: The charset registration procedure exists solely to associate a
> specific name or names with a given charset and to give an indication
> of whether or not a given charset can be used in MIME text objects.
> In particular, the general applicability and appropriateness of a
> given registered charset to a particular application is a protocol
> issue, not a registration issue, and is not dealt with by this
> registration procedure.
>
> This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
> Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
> improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
>
> This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
> Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
> should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to be
> added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
> be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.
>
> Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
> an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body
> help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
>
> To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG
> Subject: getting rfcs
>
> help: ways_to_get_rfcs
>
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.echo
> Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
> RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
> Authors, for further information.
>
>
> Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza
> USC/Information Sciences Institute
>
> ...
>
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader
> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
> of the RFCs.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
> the views of Reuters Ltd.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:14 EDT