Re: Reviewing IETF documents

From: Martin Duerst (duerst@w3.org)
Date: Mon Apr 16 2001 - 03:54:45 EDT


Hello Florian - There is no official or coordinated review of IETF
documents. Because of the volunteer nature of the IETF, it mostly
depends on individuals.

I have been in contact with the USEFOR group for a while.
What particular serious problem are you speaking about?

If you know about a problem, just tell the WG. In many cases,
it may take a few iterations to achieve common understanding.
If no solution is achieved, there are ways to escalate the
issue, but I hope we don't need to get there.

Regards, Martin.

At 23:51 01/04/15 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>"Tex Texin" <texin@progress.com> writes:
>
> > > Is someone constantly reviewing IETF documents (drafts and RFCs) which
> > > use UTF-8 or other Unicode-related technology?
>
> > Are there any specific documents that you are aware of that have
> > a problem or potential problem?
>
>So far, I've looked more closely at one RFC (2440, i.e. OpenPGP) and a
>draft (USEFOR), and in the case of USEFOR, there are a few minor
>problems, and an extremly severe, even dangerous one (it has to do
>with the use of Unicode in identifiers). I'm still investigating the
>situation (see my other message).
>
>OpenPGP uses a concept of line endings which is only adequate for
>ASCII text, and Unicode in identifiers as well (with only slight
>interoperability issues such as database queries). Usually, OpenPGP
>identifiers (i.e. user IDs) are not processed mechanically, so these
>is not a grave issue.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT