RE: Compression - binary ordered

From: Carl W. Brown (cbrown@xnetinc.com)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2001 - 15:32:26 EDT

Next message: jgo: "Re: [OT] bits and bytes"
Previous message: Edward Cherlin: "Silliness (was RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8))"
In reply to: Mark Davis: "Re: Compression - binary ordered"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Compression - binary ordered"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Mark,

Shades of UTF-8s!!! Please don't provide UTF-16 binary order.

Carl

-----Original Message-----
From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]On
Behalf Of Mark Davis
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:00 AM
To: unicode@unicode.org; Rick McGowan
Subject: Re: Compression - binary ordered

It preserves code point binary order (UTF-8 / UTF-32). However, one could
also easily produce a minor variant that preserves UTF-16 binary order as
well.

Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick McGowan" <rick@unicode.org>
To: <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 23:46
Subject: Re: Compression - binary ordered

> > The main difference from SCSU is that this method preserves binary
order.
>
> Ah. And which binary order does it preserve?
> The right one, or the other one? ;-)
>
> Rick
>
>

Next message: jgo: "Re: [OT] bits and bytes"
Previous message: Edward Cherlin: "Silliness (was RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8))"
In reply to: Mark Davis: "Re: Compression - binary ordered"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Compression - binary ordered"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:18 EDT