Re: New kana letters (was RE: Oriyan Language)

From: Thomas Chan (thomas@atlas.datexx.com)
Date: Tue Jun 05 2001 - 18:23:52 EDT


On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Marco Cimarosti wrote:

> 11 wrote:
> > [...] if you look at the chart for hiragana, you see that
> > they left space for four new kana, just in case somebody
> > decided to invent new kana. [...] I think they're
>
> Both things, I think.
> For new letters, see the yellow squares in:
[snip]
> http://www.unicode.org/charts/draftunicode32/U32-31F0.pdf

Interesting. Why is the U+31F0 to U+31FF block currently named "Katakana
Phonetic Extensions"?

"Phonetic" seems like unnecessary wordiness--is the standard set of
katakana not "phonetic"?

There also seems to be multiple ways to name an extension/supplement to
an existing block/script:

  Basic Latin : Latin-1 Supplement, Latin Extended-A,
                                 Latin Extended-B, IPA Extensions, Latin
                                 Extended Additional
  Greek : Greek Extended
  Kangxi Radicals : CJK Radicals Supplement
  Bopomofo : Bopomofo Extended
  CJK Unified Ideographs : CJK Unified Ideographs Extension A, CJK
                                 Unified Ideographs Extension B
  CJK Compatibility Ideographs : CJK Compatibility Ideographs Supplement

Any pattern to this, or is it just historical?

Thomas Chan
tc31@cornell.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:18 EDT