Mark,
I though hard about the name. I thought that maybe it should be totally
different. This would imply that it is a product in and of itself that
happens to use ICU. Instead it is more like a sample program to be used to
implement ICU, not a product in and of itself.
It provides functionality outside of ICU but this is mostly the type of
logic that does not belong in ICU itself. It is also the type of code that
users may want to tailor. As a consequence it did not make sense to build a
formal product.
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]On
Behalf Of Mark Davis
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 7:52 AM
To: Bill Kurmey; unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: xICU 3.0 Status - (Simplified Unicode Implementation)
We will respond more fully later, but I want to make it very clear that
despite the unfortunate and confusing choice of name, "xICU" is not
connected to the ICU product or team in any way.
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Kurmey" <Bill.Kurmey@v-wave.com>
To: <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 22:00
Subject: xICU 3.0 Status - (Simplified Unicode Implementation)
> At 03:16 PM 6/11/01 -0700, Carl W. Brown wrote:
> >xICU (X.Net interface for ICU) Version 3.0 is now undergoing testing.
This
> >interface is a run time interface for ICU (International Components for
> >Unicode) http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/
> >
>
> Could not find any reference on this page (or other pages) to this version
> at http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/
>
>
>
> Bill Kurmey, Edmonton, AB, Canada
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:18 EDT