U+2011 and U+2010

From: Patrick Andries (pandries@iti.qc.ca)
Date: Tue Jun 12 2001 - 21:43:16 EDT

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: And Visions of Sugar Plum UTF-8's Dance in Their Heads"
Previous message: Carl W. Brown: "UTF-8s programming problems"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: U+007E and U+02DC"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: U+2011 and U+2010"
Maybe reply: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: U+2011 and U+2010"
Maybe reply: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: U+2011 and U+2010"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

The Unicode Standard 3.0 (page 150) says that "U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN is
present for compatibility with existing standards" as if it shouldn't really
be encoded. But isn't its relation to U+2010, the same as the one that
opposes SPACE to NO-BREAK SPACE, i.e. a semantic (behavioural) one ?

Patrick Andries
Saint-Hubert (Québec)

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: And Visions of Sugar Plum UTF-8's Dance in Their Heads"
Previous message: Carl W. Brown: "UTF-8s programming problems"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: U+007E and U+02DC"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: U+2011 and U+2010"
Maybe reply: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: U+2011 and U+2010"
Maybe reply: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: U+2011 and U+2010"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:18 EDT