Re: UTF-17

From: Markus Scherer (markus.scherer@jtcsv.com)
Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 19:44:23 EDT


Nice, but you have the same kind of shortest-form problem as in UTF-8:
<38 30 30 30 30 30 30 30> could be mis-interpreted by a lenient decoder as U+0000.

Ts, ts...

At least it sorts binary in code point order.

markus



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:18 EDT