$B!!!!$i$s$^(B $B!z$8$e$&$$$C$A$c$s!z(B
$B!!!_$"$+$M(B
$B!<!<!<!<!<(B PTKA IZGT F SFNNGYGB ZRMSFTB WM
$B!!$"$^$s$1(B NFEGT FM MGYWPRMKA FM F SFNNGYGB IWOG
$B$M$1$"$:!!(B IWKK QGT FT IPQGT ZFXG GHRFK YWJZNM.
$B$i$s$^!!!!(B
$B!<!<!<!<!<(B
$B$$$$$J$:$1(B
--- Original Message ---
$B:9=P?M(B: Michael Everson <everson@indigo.ie>;
$B08@h(B: Edward Cherlin <Edward.Cherlin.SY.67@aya.yale.edu>;
Cc: unicode@unicode.org;
$BF|;~(B: 01/07/02 23:16
$B7oL>(B: Re: New characters query
>At 12:33 -0700 2001-07-02, Edward Cherlin wrote:
>>Has anyone proposed the following for inclusion in Unicode? If so,
>>what is their status?
>>
>>Daoist Hexagrams, 64 forms (the trigrams are already included, but
>>with no combining mechanism)
>
>You're welcome to, if you have evidence for these.
>
Hell, we've ALL seen these. Who hasn't played with the I Ching once in their life?
They are cool.
That is good.
Is there any sort of Hanzi collation scheme that puts the Han digits one through nine in numerical order?
Poor Han digits. All the other digits get to be right next to their friends, but not the Han digits!
And the Han digits are probably the oldest of all digits! Except maybe the zero. (Did they get it from us or did we get it from them?)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 13:48:07 EDT