Re: Erratum in Unicode book

From: Tom Emerson (tree@basistech.com)
Date: Mon Jul 09 2001 - 09:42:02 EDT


=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJEYkcyRJJCYkaiRlJCYkOBsoQg==?= writes:
> >So you replace radicals with something else. It's the same problem:
> >someone not familiar with hanzi are no better served with that method
> >than sticking to Kangxi or some other, er, radical, scheme.
>
> Quick how many strokes in mouth. Bzzt. Wrong. Three, not four.

Not a fair question. Obviously someone who has never counted strokes
before is going to guess four, until you explain to them the rules,
which are quite logical. So you propose that someone has to memorize
200+ radicals in addition to counting strokes? Please.

    -tree

-- 
Tom Emerson                                          Basis Technology Corp.
Sr. Sinostringologist                              http://www.basistech.com
  "Beware the lollipop of mediocrity: lick it once and you suck forever"



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Jul 09 2001 - 09:08:40 EDT