Re: Unicode 3.1 and Roman numeral harmonic analysis

From: B (11@onna.com)
Date: Tue Jul 17 2001 - 20:57:52 EDT

Previous message: Edward Cherlin: "Re: Unicode 3.1 and Roman numeral harmonic analysis"
Maybe in reply to: Patrick Andries: "Unicode 3.1 and Roman numeral harmonic analysis"
Next in thread: Lukas Pietsch: "Re: Unicode 3.1 and Roman numeral harmonic analysis"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

So: is it because of the 12 tone scale that Unicode has exactly 12 Roman numerals? Or is it clock faces?

$B"!$8$e$&$$$C$A$c$s"!(B

?$B!V0&!W$O!V$"$$!W$G$9!#!V(B10^-10$B!W$b!V$"$$!W$G$9!#!h!V0&!W$O!V(B10^-10$B!W$G$9!#(B
?$B;d$O$m$3$($s$i$+$Y$5$G$9!#(B
?$B"v%i!<%a%s$O$$$$$G$9$h"v(B

This notation provides chord names that are independent
>of the current key, so that CEG is a I chord in the key of C, but a V chord
>in the key of F, while FEC is the I chord in F.
>

Previous message: Edward Cherlin: "Re: Unicode 3.1 and Roman numeral harmonic analysis"
Maybe in reply to: Patrick Andries: "Unicode 3.1 and Roman numeral harmonic analysis"
Next in thread: Lukas Pietsch: "Re: Unicode 3.1 and Roman numeral harmonic analysis"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 17 2001 - 21:52:25 EDT