Re: [OT] o-circumflex

From: David Starner (dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org)
Date: Thu Sep 06 2001 - 16:40:22 EDT

Previous message: Majid Bhurgri: "OT Nastaleeq conforming to Unicode"
In reply to: Thierry Sourbier: "Re: [OT] o-circumflex"
Next in thread: Ayers, Mike: "RE: [OT] o-circumflex"
Next in thread: David Starner: "Re: [OT] o-circumflex"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 04:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Sourbier wrote:
> The only little thing to know about French and diacritical mark is that when
> doing a sort diacritical mark are evaluated from right to left. (e.g.
> "cote" < "côte" < "coté" vs the English order "cote" < "coté" < "côte" ).

I'm not sure there is an established English sort order. It's not a
problem that comes up much in English.

-- 
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and 
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg

Previous message: Majid Bhurgri: "OT Nastaleeq conforming to Unicode"
In reply to: Thierry Sourbier: "Re: [OT] o-circumflex"
Next in thread: Ayers, Mike: "RE: [OT] o-circumflex"
Next in thread: David Starner: "Re: [OT] o-circumflex"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Sep 06 2001 - 17:49:25 EDT