Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Sat Sep 22 2001 - 09:31:06 EDT

Previous message: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support"
In reply to: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support"
Next in thread: Andy Heninger: "Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@knm.org.pl>

> Why would UTF-16 be easier for internal processing than UTF-8?
> Both are variable-length encodings.

Good straw man!

Working with UTF-16 is immensely easier than working with UTF-8. As I am am
sure you know! :-)

MichKa

Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc.
http://www.trigeminal.com/

Previous message: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support"
In reply to: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support"
Next in thread: Andy Heninger: "Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Sep 22 2001 - 08:20:52 EDT