> Tengwar has vowel diacritics that seem to follow temporal order, so it
> may be that it should be an abugida rather than an alphasyllabary, but
> it is not an abjad. I am not too sure of the distinction between
> abugida and alphasyllabary, to be honest. Help on this would be
> welcome.
Here's something:
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/4948/tengwar/
| and Cirth would be Alphabet (like Runic).
> Cirth is already described as an alphabet, so I am not sure what you
> mean.
Ooops, sorry, missed that.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 10 2001 - 11:43:48 EDT