Re: Plane One use, was Re: HTML Validation

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Sun Dec 16 2001 - 20:06:08 EST

Previous message: Marc Durdin: "Re: Plane One use, was Re: HTML Validation"
In reply to: Marc Durdin: "Re: Plane One use, was Re: HTML Validation"
Next in thread: Marc Durdin: "Re: Plane One use, was Re: HTML Validation"
Next in thread: Martin Duerst: "Re: Clean and Unicode compliance"
Reply: Marc Durdin: "Re: Plane One use, was Re: HTML Validation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: "Marc Durdin" <mcdurdin@tavultesoft.com>

> With keyboards under Windows, you must send a surrogate pair for
> WM_CHAR messages, but you need to send a UTF-32 codepoint for
> WM_UNICHAR messages.

I am not sure I understand.... keyboards as defined in the DDK do not send
either message. I assume that you are referring to one of the third party
solutions that does not use the documented DDK interfaces for keyboards?

MichKa

Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc. -- http://www.trigeminal.com/

Previous message: Marc Durdin: "Re: Plane One use, was Re: HTML Validation"
In reply to: Marc Durdin: "Re: Plane One use, was Re: HTML Validation"
Next in thread: Marc Durdin: "Re: Plane One use, was Re: HTML Validation"
Next in thread: Martin Duerst: "Re: Clean and Unicode compliance"
Reply: Marc Durdin: "Re: Plane One use, was Re: HTML Validation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Dec 16 2001 - 19:37:11 EST