Re: Devanagari

From: Aman Chawla (creativezeal@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 20 2002 - 23:57:29 EST


----- Original Message -----
From: "James Kass" <jameskass@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Aman Chawla" <creativezeal@hotmail.com>; "Unicode"
<unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: Devanagari

> 25% may not be 300%, but it isn't insignificant. As you note, if the
> mark-up were removed from both of those files, the percentage of
> increase would be slightly higher. But, as connection speeds continue
> to improve, these differences are becoming almost minuscule.

With regards to South Asia, where the most widely used modems are approx. 14
kbps, maybe some 36 kbps and rarely 56 kbps, where broadband/DSL is mostly
unheard of, efficiency in data transmission is of paramount importance...
how can we convince the south asian user to create websites in an encoding
that would make his client's 14 kbps modem as effective (rather,
ineffective) as a 4.6 kbps modem?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Jan 20 2002 - 23:27:00 EST