Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>Patrick riposted (<== note the French contaminating my English)
>
I only reposted.
[Roman numerals being coded apart]
>
>TUS 3.0, p. 299: "Number form characters are encoded solely for
>compatibility with existing standards. The same considerations with
>respect to compatibility apply as noted in the discussion of
>letterlike symbols. ... The Roman numerals can be composed of
>sequences of the appropriate Latin letters."
>
>As Patrick knows, since he has translated the standard into French. :-)
>
Ok, ok. Sigh. Red face. Shame. Did mention 2180.. 2183 which can't be
decomposed though...
But yes, you are right : Hebrew letter-numerals would not need to be
encoded separately (in any case, we were speaking about the "numeral
upper dot" and it being deunified).
Patrick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jan 22 2002 - 21:16:35 EST