In a message dated 2002-01-27 18:51:35 Pacific Standard Time,
juuitchan@hotmail.com writes:
> First, have we all servers?
No. Assuming we all do is no better than assuming we all have broadband or
T1 connections.
> Second, if it is a small attachment, the number of bytes transmitted to GO
> there may well be greater than the number to send the bloody thing. How
> about an arbitrary attachment limit of 1535 (Œê˜C‡‚킹F‚Ђ߂݂±)
bytes?
I just sent a 500-byte attachment to the Unicode list without any qualms.
Almost all messages are longer than 500 bytes, especially when you take
headers into account. However, there is certainly such a thing as "too
long," and I have no idea where to draw the line and say "this attachment is
short enough, that one is too long."
-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Jan 27 2002 - 22:43:48 EST